To the Editor:
I am writing this letter as a follow-up to the one that I co-signed as one of the University Distinguished Professors at North Dakota State University. The letter, published in many regional news outlets a couple of weeks ago, was entitled “Budget Cuts to North Dakota University System Will Have ‘Long-Lasting, Perhaps Irreversible Impacts’ on Quality of Higher Education and Economic Recovery in ND.”
Before I go on, let me emphasize that the views I am expressing are mine and mine alone. I have identified myself using my academic title and affiliation only to let readers know that I have some understanding of higher education and its role after more than 40 years and six universities in four states.
I felt compelled to write because of the statements attributed to ND Senate Majority Leader, Rich Wardner (R-Dickinson), who said, “Everybody has to cinch it up,” and then later stated he “was confident funding could be reinstated after this biennium for programs and jobs that are needed … I understand we could lose some quality people, but it is what it is. You can’t spend money you don’t have.”
This was after he had emphatically stated, “We [the legislature] are guarding it [the Legacy Fund] very carefully [as it is an] asset in the future.” The problem with the views of Senator Wardner and others like him is three-fold.
First, the proposed budget cuts for higher education will result in loss of our best, and especially our best younger, faculty and will make it nearly impossible to recruit outstanding faculty in the future. With loss of our best faculty it will take decades to restore the programs that will be impacted.
This is because, just as for university sports programs, like NDSU football, for example, academic programs take decades to become nationally competitive and require not only strong and continual support but outstanding faculty (analogous to coaches for sports).
Second, and importantly, the number and quality of classes will decline, and because students will receive a lower quality education, many will go elsewhere including leaving the region.
Third is the critical importance of higher education as an economic engine. Many studies throughout the world, the U.S., and North Dakota have confirmed this, in large part because higher education provides not only a highly-educated workforce, but also many of the innovations needed to sustain businesses and industries, including agriculture, in the ever-more-competitive future.
In addition, a highly-educated workforce is especially important to a state like North Dakota, which not so long ago was experiencing an alarming out-migration of its population.
I am really writing as a concerned citizen, whose grandchildren will soon be looking at universities in the region and the opportunities they provide.
In my view the time to provide the support to ensure a brighter future is now. I am convinced the severe budget cuts to higher education that are being proposed will in fact ensure a bleak future for the citizens of the state and region.
-Lawrence P. Reynolds, PhD
August 15th 2018
July 14th 2018
July 11th 2018
July 5th 2018
May 16th 2018
by HPR Contributor
by Ryan Jankeryanjanke@hpr1.comPhoto by Anne BradleyValkyries of the Valley will invade the North Dakota Apartment Wrestling Federation (NDAWF) for Brawl-esque, a variety show that will be held at Prairie Brothers Brewing Company…
by Sabrina Hornung
It’s bad enough when his word versus her word regarding sexual assault gets out in a high school hallway, but can you imagine it spreading throughout the national news media? Imagine reliving those events every time you turn on…
FARGO - A collection of memories from High Plains Reader's annual Cocktail Showdown. Participants were judged on creativity, flavor, and presentation; and this year we added a new category. Like years before, each establishment was…
By Melissa Martinmelissamartincounselor@live.comThink back to one of your worst small decisions. Then answer the following questions:How did you make the decision?What happened after the decision?When did you know it was the worst…
by Andrew Alexis Varvelmr.firstname.lastname@example.org“If a piece of equipment purchased in the 1920s is kept up and can guarantee, at present, an operable rate close to 100 percent and if it can bear the production burden placed on…