BISMARCK – Mary Rennich and a handful of North Dakotans only wanted to listen, perhaps ask a question about healthcare if time allowed during a Republican press conference at the North Dakota Farm Bureau on Wednesday.
Instead of having their opinions welcomed, current Congressman Kevin Cramer’s campaign manager, Pat Finken, said they were on private property, and threatened Rennich and others with physical removal from the building if they dared say a word.
“I was incredibly disappointed and disturbed that Congressman Cramer’s campaign threatened to physically remove me from the building if I spoke or asked a question about the care and protections my two sons depend on,” Rennich, from Bismarck, said. “All I wanted were answers, but I wasn’t allowed to speak or ask a question of Cramer – or I would have been removed from the property. As a constituent and as a mother, I want to know how Sam and Jesse would get care if Kevin Cramer got his way.”
One of Rennich’s sons suffers from autism and a learning disability, and the other with epilepsy, Rennich said, which makes the issues surrounding coverage for those with pre-existing conditions important to her, as well as more than 317,000 other North Dakotans.
Questions pertaining to the incident and directed to Cramer’s campaign communications director Tim Rasmussen were not answered.
The Republican press conference on Wednesday was in damage control mode, attempting to “set the record straight” on healthcare issues, and was attended by Lieutenant Governor Brent Sanford, Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem, Insurance Commissioner Jon Godfread, and state Senator Kelly Armstrong. Each voiced their support for the Graham-Cassidy health care bill, which Democrats say undermines protections currently in place for those with pre-existing conditions, seniors, children, and people with disabilities.
The same day Rennich and others were threatened, Cramer’s incumbent rival for the U.S. Senate, Democrat Heidi Heitkamp, held a press conference by telephone striking back at Cramer’s support for a Texas-led federal lawsuit that Stenehjem has brought the state into. The lawsuit seeks to repeal the Affordable Care Act by alleging the law is unconstitutional as its individual mandate is no longer valid.
On Tuesday, Republicans stated that North Dakota – joined by 19 other states – is not deterred from its participation in the federal lawsuit.
During a recent interview, Cramer said that the Republican plan will not hurt those with pre-existing conditions, but added that some of his constituents are playing the system.
“Our bill maintains, or doesn’t repeal previous existing conditions, but you can’t game the system either,” Cramer said. “We’re not going to allow you to abuse the system just because you have a pre-existing condition.”
Cramer has voted 65 times against current healthcare laws, and voted to repeal the ACA without a replacement five times. He also voted to dismantle Medicaid expansion.
“Democrats continue to push a big lie and we can’t stand for it,” a press release from the North Dakota Republican Party Communications Director Jake Wilkins stated. “The only group talking about eliminating coverage for pre-existing conditions are the Democrats.
“Eighty-four percent of North Dakotans are covered by their employer or the government and will maintain coverage of pre-existing conditions after ACA repeal,” the press release stated. “Republican replacement legislation will guarantee coverage of pre-existing conditions.”
Not true, Heitkamp, former U.S. Congressman Earl Pomeroy, and other Democrats said. Pomeroy is currently working with Dakotans for Health, an ad hoc group of North and South Dakotans focused on maintaining and improving provisions within the ACA.
“If the Stenehjem lawsuit is successful everyone loses protections for pre-existing conditions. Period,” the report from Dakotans for Health stated.
If the federal lawsuit succeeds, insurance companies would be able to deny, drop, or charge more for coverage for more than 317,000 North Dakotans with pre-existing conditions, 47,000 state residents with health insurance through Obamacare, and 7,500 young adults currently enrolled on their parent’s health insurance plans, according to Dakotans for Health.
The Graham-Cassidy bill, deeply unpopular in Democrats and Republicans including senators John McCain and Susan Collins, will take up to $676 million away from Medicaid. Premiums would skyrocket, could raise costs for seniors slapping them with an age tax.
Republicans say current insurance rates have gone up from $278 to $399 a month because of Obamacare, but because Democrats say the increase is a direct result of GOP sabotage, chipping away at the law and creating chaotic markets, according to the Dakotans for Health.
More than 150 patient groups, physicians, and hospitals, including American Medical Association, American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, and others, say that repealing ACA would have devastating effects on insurance markets and the economy.
Partial repeal of the ACA or eliminating Medicaid expansion would be “catastrophic,” forcing 32 million Americans from their insurance plans by 2026, according to the Public Health Scholars and the American Public Health Association. Additionally, before the ACA protections, discrimination against those with pre-existing conditions, age rating, and annual and lifetime caps were out of reach for many older adults.
A recent study by the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association also reported that 14 percent of farmers have transitioned from employer-based insurance options to become enrolled in a public health insurance plan since the ACA became law.
Republican claims that Obamacare does not work for North Dakotans is also wrong, the Dakotans for Health reported. Since the ACA became law, 47,000 North Dakotans have health insurance directly because of the ACA, and it is also illegal for health insurance companies to discriminate against those with pre-existing conditions. Because of Medicaid expansion, more than $27 million in federal funds have been added to rural state hospitals.
“Cramer already voted for a bill President Trump called ‘mean,’ but now he’s doubling down on his support for Graham-Cassidy and his dangerous health care agenda that means fewer protections, higher costs, and less coverage for North Dakota families,” Sean Higgins, Heitkamp’s press secretary stated. “Cramer can desperately try to rewrite history – but in this election, he won’t be able to hide from his 65 votes to undermine or repeal the care and patient protections North Dakotans rely on.”
If Mary Rennich and her family lost insurance, she would be facing more than $7,500 a month in medical bills.
“Being a citizen of North Dakota, I think we should have a voice,” Rennich said. “I don’t think they should be afraid to hear questions and have some answers ready. I think that’s their responsibility… I would like to ask some questions. And I know there are a lot of other families that would like to ask, too, because we’re really scared. We’re very frightened.”
September 22nd 2018
September 21st 2018
September 21st 2018
September 20th 2018
September 19th 2018
by HPR Contributor
by Ryan Jankeryanjanke@hpr1.comPhoto by Anne BradleyValkyries of the Valley will invade the North Dakota Apartment Wrestling Federation (NDAWF) for Brawl-esque, a variety show that will be held at Prairie Brothers Brewing Company…
by Sabrina Hornung
It’s bad enough when his word versus her word regarding sexual assault gets out in a high school hallway, but can you imagine it spreading throughout the national news media? Imagine reliving those events every time you turn on…
FARGO - A collection of memories from High Plains Reader's annual Cocktail Showdown. Participants were judged on creativity, flavor, and presentation; and this year we added a new category. Like years before, each establishment was…
By Melissa Martinmelissamartincounselor@live.comThink back to one of your worst small decisions. Then answer the following questions:How did you make the decision?What happened after the decision?When did you know it was the worst…
by Andrew Alexis Varvelmr.email@example.com“If a piece of equipment purchased in the 1920s is kept up and can guarantee, at present, an operable rate close to 100 percent and if it can bear the production burden placed on…